Towards odds of making out toward address, discover a critical communications anywhere between grandiose narcissism and you can new member intercourse, ? = .161, t = 2.819, p = .005. So it telecommunications are showed inside Fig 2. The simple slopes for men (simple slope = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you may females (effortless slope = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) just weren’t high. Grandiose narcissists did not share an increased probability of kissing with an attached address more than just one (? = .068, t = step one.127, p = .261), indicating you to grandiose narcissism wasn’t for the mate poaching to own a preliminary-label fling.
Grandiose narcissists will report companion poaching -especially for the fresh brief-identity . Although not, a question stays concerning whether they see members of matchmaking so much more well worth searching for than just those who are unmarried. Widman and you may McNulty reason why grandiose narcissistic tendencies could well be activated around the points normally (for instance the care about-declaration out-of lives prevalence away from intimate decisions), yet not feel activated whenever placed in a certain condition. Therefore, you’ll be able you to grandiose narcissists divulge a track record of entertaining in the spouse poaching, but do not fundamentally find those who work in dating becoming greatest mates. I checked-out so it opportunity when you look at the five knowledge.
Lover poaching directory.
For long-label partner poaching, grandiose narcissism Spanish Sites dating only is actually a serious predictor for females (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and you may a marginally significant predictor for males (? = .218, t = 1.725, p = .088). Not one of your Huge Four variables was in fact high. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a significant predictor off profits in the poaching with the long-title for males (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), but it is actually for women (? = .340, t = 2.369, p = .021). None of other factors was basically high apart from women’s neuroticism; whenever females were far more neurotic, they advertised a great deal more achievements within poaching for some time-label intimate relationships.
Overall performance
Interesting, grandiose narcissism wasn’t associated with companion poaching certainly people. So it outcome is consistent with results reported because of the Kardum and colleagues . Hence, you will be able you to grandiose narcissistic ladies are more often accountable from mate poaching.
Material and you will process
There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.