Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on https://datingmentor.org/gay-dating/ three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Amoraim could not disagreement tannaitic rulings rather than tannaitic support even so they written fences in the Torah to stop inadvertent sins
That it report by the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi generally removed every menstruating women from the normal menstrual class and you will placed him or her regarding the irregular standing of zava because most normal symptoms last at the very least 3 days. Apparently their question are one considering the state-of-the-art clarifications necessary to decide when one is niddah and in case you can feel a zava, one to you are going to visited fail that have grievous outcomes. Very first this new decree got restricted perception; it looks to own come regional, and could was basically limited to situations where doubt is actually with it plus the local populace was not well enough discovered to choose when you look at the such situations ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Certainly it was not a broad decree for everybody out-of Israel, however it are step one where direction. In the first a couple advice, Rabbi’s declaration deals with a female which is a small zava or may be a great niddah. This woman is handled in the 1st instance as the an effective niddah, that have a beneficial seven-big date ages of impurity, unlike 1 day away from impurity during the day away from hemorrhaging, the signal to own a minor zava. In the next analogy she’s treated given that a beneficial niddah and you may a zava if the first day was inside her ziva several months (new 11 days between menstrual episodes). On 3rd situation, this woman is handled since the a whole zava. All the three rulings take the far more stringent updates.
Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.
